Mr Meade
There is
a good deal in what
Sie A. Kennedy sayoi
but dould pont
out that the distinction which it in
sought to establish at
Song Kong
between Adriatic and European Demants of the fort, does not exist at the Sharks Settlements or in Exylon; -
and 2o4y, that,
as it is incondolent
with the Rongthong Pension Minult, thas Miente ought to be altered
iftin adoptedt.
4
Kennedy's
view is the
Sie A. Kennedy pleade
the "practice" of the Hong King fort in dealing with finese offices. His Schedule shows that the cases peeding Fan a Wye's (which hast rained this question) numbered 5 only in 10 years.
Of these 5 the 10th and 2. are irrelevant as
precedenti.
There remains three cases (which (occused in 1872) ogmen who,
as refonds length of service, were entitled to pensions, but who
4. The first nove
hand
notentille
Lo out.
ได้
received fratuities. _ These 3 precedents. were created withions Authority. Had they been reported to the Secretary of State, they would have heen challenged at the thine; but as record is fond of their having beer onbruited to Lord Kuntally Ipreoume the fol. for? Should he called on for explanation.
of Sir A Kennedy's views
70
be entertained, Ithink that Chines who have served 10 you, ought to have the option of a peucin (at look nate then for Suspens) fatuity. I dont know
any
better seals
for fratirties than that which tie A. Kameday proposes (one month's pay for
Llach
Rule
year ofteira). This a thumb", _ but Whould chunk it scarcely worth while to deal
with much
Cameo
on
a
more
elebrate plan, and to scrutinize
the poor Chinese
in order to
determine their expectancy of
life. In some cases
the for?
sight gain, in others lose in
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.